The continuous infusion of acylated ghrelin enhances growth hormone secretion and worsens glucose metabolism in humans.

CONTEXT: Acylated ghrelin (AG) has been discovered as a natural ligand of the GH secretagogue receptor type 1a and is now recognized as an important orexigenic factor. Besides stimulation of GH secretion and appetite, it exerts other central and peripheral actions including modulation of insulin secretion, glucose and lipid metabolism. OBJECTIVE: To define the effects of the continuous iv infusion of AG in humans with particular attention to metabolic parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied the effects of 16- h (from 21:00 to 13:00 h) infusion of AG (0.5 microg/kg/h) or saline in 8 young volunteers who were provided with isocaloric balanced meals. GH, cortisol, insulin, glucose, free fatty acid (FFA), and ghrelin levels were assayed every 20 min. RESULTS: AG infusion increased circulating total ghrelin to a steady state that was maintained over 16 h infusion of the peptide. With respect to saline, AG infusion significantly modified GH, cortisol, insulin, and glucose profiles and decreased FFA area under the curve (p<0.01). AG increased GH pulse frequency and approximate entropy (p<0.05). AG enhanced the glucose response to both dinner (p<0.02) and breakfast (p<0.03). AG infusion blunted the early insulin response to dinner (p<0.03) but enhanced the second-phase insulin response to dinner and breakfast (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The continuous exposure to AG in humans enhances somatotroph secretion but also worsens glucose metabolism, although it inhibits lipolysis. These findings in normal young volunteers are consistent with data from studies in animals and suggest that acylated ghrelin is likely to play a negative role in glucose metabolism.

Cortistatin-17 and -14 exert the same endocrine activities as somatostatin in humans.

Cortistatin (CST) is a neuropeptide, which binds with high affinity all somatostatin (SS) receptor subtypes and shows high structural homology with SS itself. A receptor specific for CST only, i.e., not recognized by SS, has been recently described in agreement with data reporting that not all CST actions are shared by SS. Interestingly, CST but not SS also binds ghrelin receptor (GHS-R1a) in vitro, suggesting a potential interplay between CST and ghrelin system. The aim of this study was to investigate in humans the endocrine and metabolic activities of human CST-17 in comparison with rat CST-14 that has previously been shown to exert the same endocrine actions of SS in healthy volunteers. To this aim, in six healthy male volunteers (age [median, 3rd-97th centiles]: 28.5; 23.6-34.3 years; Body Mass Index: 23.5; 21.0-25.1 kg/m(2)), we studied the effects of human CST-17 (2.0 microg/kg/h iv over 120 min), rat CST-14 (2.0 microg/kg/h iv over 120 min) and SS-14 (2.0 microg/kg/h iv over 120 min) on: (a) spontaneous GH, ACTH, PRL, cortisol, insulin and glucose levels; (b) the GH responses to GHRH (1.0 microg/kg iv at 0 min); (c) the GH, PRL, ACTH, cortisol, insulin and glucose responses to ghrelin (1.0 microg/kg iv at 0 min). CST-17 inhibited (p < 0.01) basal GH secretion to the same extent of CST-14 and SS-14. Spontaneous PRL, ACTH and cortisol secretion were not significantly modified by CST-17, CST-14 or SS-14. CST-17 as well as CST-14 and SS-14 also inhibited (p < 0.05) spontaneous insulin secretion to a similar extent. None of these peptides modified glucose levels. The GH response to GHRH was inhibited to the same extent by CST-17 (p < 0.01), CST-14 (p < 0.01) and SS-14 (p < 0.05 ). The ghrelin-induced GH response was higher than that elicited by GHRH (p < 0.01) and inhibited by CST-17 (p < 0.05) as well as by CST-14 (p < 0.05) and SS-14 (p < 0.01). The PRL, ACTH and cortisol responses to ghrelin were unaffected by CST-17, CST-14 or SS-14. On the other hand, the inhibitory effect of ghrelin on insulin levels was abolished by CST-17, CST-14 or SS-14 (p < 0.05) that, in turn, did not modify the ghrelin-induced increase in glucose levels. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that human CST-17 and rat CST-14 exert the same endocrine activities of SS in humans. The endocrine actions of human and rat CST therefore are likely to reflect activation of classical SS receptors.

Non-acylated ghrelin counteracts the metabolic but not the neuroendocrine response to acylated ghrelin in humans.

Ghrelin possesses strong GH-releasing activity but also other endocrine activities including stimulation of PRL and ACTH secretion, modulation of insulin secretion and glucose metabolism. It is assumed that the GH secretagogue (GHS) receptor (GHS-R) 1a mediates ghrelin actins provided its acylation in Serine 3; in fact, acylated ghrelin only is able to exert endocrine activities. Acylated ghrelin (AG) is present in serum at a 2.5 fold lower concentration than unacylated ghrelin (UAG). UAG, however, is not biologically inactive; it shares with AG some non-endocrine actions like cardiovascular effects, modulation of cell proliferation and even some influence on adipogenesis. Thus, these actions are likely to be mediated by GHS-R subtypes able to bind ghrelin independently of its acylation. In order to further clarify whether UAG is really devoid of any endocrine action, we studied the interaction of the combined administration of AG and UAG (1.0 microg/kg i.v.) in 6 normal young volunteers (age [mean +/- SE]: 25.4 +/- 1.2 yr; BMI: 22.3 +/- 1.0 kg/m2). As expected, AG induced marked increase (p < 0.01) in circulating GH, PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels. AG administration was also followed by a decrease in insulin levels (-285.4 +/- 64.8 mU*min/l; p < 0.05) and an increase in plasma glucose levels (1068.4 +/- 390.4 mg*min/dl; p < 0.01). UAG alone did not induce any change in these parameters. UAG also failed to modify the GH, PRL, ACTH and cortisol responses to AG. However, when UAG was co-administered together with AG, no significant change in insulin (-0.5 +/- 40.9 mU*min/l) and glucose levels (455.9 +/- 88.3 mg*min/dl) was recorded anymore, indicating that the insulin and glucose response to AG has been abolished by UAG. In conclusion, non-acylated ghrelin does not affect the GH, PRL, and ACTH response to acylated ghrelin but is able to antagonize the effects of acylated ghrelin on insulin secretion and glucose levels. These findings indicate that unacylated ghrelin is metabolically active and is likely to counterbalance the influence of acylated ghrelin on insulin secretion and glucose metabolism. As GHS-R1a is not bound by unacylated ghrelin, these findings suggest that GHS receptor subtypes mediate the metabolic actions of both acylated and unacylated ghrelin.

The endocrine response to acute ghrelin administration is blunted in patients with anorexia nervosa, a ghrelin hypersecretory state.

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin, a gastric-derived natural ligand of the GH secretagogue (GHS)-receptor (GHS-R), strongly stimulates GH secretion but also possesses other neuroendocrine actions, stimulates food intake and modulates the endocrine pancreas and energy homeostasis. Ghrelin secretion is negatively modulated by food intake. Similarly, glucose and also insulin probably exert an inhibitory effect on ghrelin secretion. Fasting ghrelin levels are reduced in obesity, elevated in anorexia nervosa and restored by weight recovery. The chronic elevation of circulating ghrelin levels in anorexia suggested the hypothesis of an alteration of the sensitivity to the orexigenic action of ghrelin in this condition. The aim of this study was to define the endocrine actions of ghrelin in patients with anorexia nervosa. DESIGN: We enrolled nine women with anorexia nervosa of restricter type [AN; age (mean +/- SEM) 24.2 +/- 1.8 years; body mass index (BMI) 14.7 +/- 0.4 kg/m2] and seven normal young women in their early follicular phase as control group (NW; age 30.6 +/- 3.1 years; BMI 20.3 +/- 0.5 kg/m2). MEASUREMENTS: In all the subjects we studied the GH, PRL, ACTH, cortisol, insulin and glucose responses to acute ghrelin administration (1.0 microg/kg as i.v. bolus). The GH response to GHRH (1.0 microg/kg as i.v. bolus) and basal ghrelin and IGF-I levels were also evaluated in all the subjects. RESULTS: Basal morning ghrelin and GH levels in AN (643.6 +/- 21.3 ng/l and 10.4 +/- 0.5 microg/l, respectively) were higher (P < 0.05) than in NW (233.5 +/- 14.2 ng/l and 0.7 +/- 0.7 microg/l, respectively). However, IGF-I levels in AN (145.3 +/- 10.9 microg/l) were lower (P < 0.05) than in NW (325.4 +/- 12.6 microg/l). The GH response to GHRH in AN was higher (P < 0.05) than that in NW, but in AN the GH response to ghrelin was lower (P < 0.05) than that in NW. In AN and NW ghrelin also induced similar increases (P < 0.05) in PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels. Ghrelin administration was followed by significant increase in glucose levels in NW (P < 0.05) but not in AN. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that anorexia nervosa, a clinical condition of ghrelin hypersecretion, shows a specific reduction in the GH response to ghrelin, despite the hyper-responsiveness to GHRH administration. The impaired GH response to ghrelin in anorexia nervosa agrees with previous evidence of blunted GH response to synthetic GH secretagogues and could reflect desensitization of the GHS receptor induced by the chronic elevation of ghrelin levels in this pathological state.

Ghrelin: a link between eating disorders, obesity and reproduction.

Ghrelin, a 28-amino acid acylated peptide predominantly produced by the stomach, displays strong GH-releasing activity mediated by the hypothalamic-pituitary GH secretagogues (GHS) receptors (GHS-R) which had been shown specific for a family of synthetic, orally active molecules known as GHS. However, ghrelin and GHS, acting on central and peripheral receptors, also exert other actions. These include influence on pituitary functions, orexigenic action, influence on exocrine and endocrine gastro-entero-pancreatic functions, cardiovascular and anti-proliferative effects. In particular, the effect of ghrelin in promoting food intake and modulating energy metabolism strongly suggested that ghrelin has a key role in managing the neuroendocrine and metabolic response to starvation and that could be involved in the pathogenesis and/or in the metabolic and neuro-hormonal alterations of obesity and eating disorders. Although specific alterations in ghrelin secretion and/or action in obesity and anorexia nervosa (AN) have already been reported, the possibility that ghrelin analogues acting as agonists or antagonists has clinical perspectives for treatment of eating disorders presently remains a dream.

Effects of cortistatin-14 and somatostatin-14 on the endocrine response to hexarelin in humans.

Cortistatin (CST)-14, a neuropeptide with high structural homology with somatostatine (SS)-14, binds all SS receptor subtypes but also shows activities not shared by SS. CST and SS are often co-expressed in the same neurons but are regulated by different stimuli. Moreover, CST, but not SS, also binds the GH secretagogue (GHS) receptor. We compared the effects of CST-14 and SS-14 (2.0 microg/kg/h i.v. from -30 to +90 min) on the endocrine response to hexarelin (HEX, 1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min), a synthetic GHS, in 6 normal volunteers [age (mean+/-SEM): 28.7+/-2.9 yr; body mass index: 23.4+/-0.8 kg/m2]. GH, PRL, ACTH, cortisol, insulin and glucose levels were measured at each time point. CST-14 inhibited spontaneous GH secretion [delta-areas under curves (-AUC): -83.57+/-44.8 vs 2.3+/-2.7 microg/l/h, p<0.01] to the same extent of SS-14 (-186.1+/-162.9 microg/l/h, p<0.01). CST-14 as well as SS-14 also inhibited insulin secretion (p<0.05). The GH response to HEX was similarly inhibited by either CST-14 (AUC: 3814.1+/-924.2 vs 1212.9+/-379.8 microg/l/h, p<0.05) or SS-14 (720.9+/-158.6 microg/l/h, p<0.05). HEX significantly increased PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels but these responses were not modified by either CST-14 or SS-14. The effects of CST-14 and SS-14 on insulin and glucose levels were not modified by HEX. In conclusion, this study shows that CST-14 inhibits the GH response to HEX to the same extent of SS-14. Like SS-14, CST-14 also inhibits insulin secretion but both do not modify the stimulatory effects of HEX on lactotroph and corticotroph secretion. Thus, CST-14 exerts full SS-14 activity in humans.

Neuroendocrine and metabolic effects of acute ghrelin administration in human obesity.

Ghrelin stimulates appetite and plays a role in the neuroendocrine response to energy balance variations. Ghrelin levels are inversely associated with body mass index (BMI), increased by fasting and decreased by food intake, glucose load, insulin, and somatostatin. Ghrelin levels are reduced in obesity, a condition of hyperinsulinism, reduced GH secretion, and hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis hyperactivity. We studied the endocrine and metabolic response to acute ghrelin administration (1.0 microg/kg i.v.) in nine obese women [OB; BMI (mean +/- SD) 36.3 +/- 2.3 kg/m(2)] and seven normal women (NW; BMI 20.3 +/- 1.7 kg/m(2)). Basal ghrelin levels in NW were higher than in OB (P < 0.05). In NW, ghrelin increased (P < 0.05) GH, prolactin (PRL), ACTH, cortisol, and glucose levels but did not modify insulin. In OB, ghrelin increased (P < 0.01) GH, PRL, ACTH, and cortisol levels. The GH response to ghrelin in OB was 55% lower (P < 0.02) than in NW, whereas the PRL, ACTH, and cortisol responses were similar. In OB, ghrelin increased glucose and reduced insulin (P < 0.05). Thus, obesity shows remarkable reduction of the somatotroph responsiveness to ghrelin, suggesting that ghrelin hyposecretion unlikely explains the impairment of somatotroph function in obesity. On the other hand, in obesity ghrelin shows preserved influence on PRL, ACTH, and insulin secretion as well as in glucose levels.

Effects of ghrelin on the insulin and glycemic responses to glucose, arginine, or free fatty acids load in humans.

Ghrelin possesses central and peripheral endocrine actions including influence on the endocrine pancreatic function. To clarify this latter ghrelin action, in seven normal young subjects [age (mean +/- SEM), 28.3 +/- 3.1 yr; body mass index, 21.9 +/- 0.9 kg/m(2)), we studied insulin and glucose levels after acute ghrelin administration (1.0 microg/kg i.v.) alone or combined with glucose [oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), 100 g orally], arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg i.v.) or free fatty acid (FFA, Intralipid 10%, 250 ml). Ghrelin inhibited (P < 0.05) insulin and increased (P < 0.05) glucose levels. OGTT increased (P < 0.01) glucose and insulin levels. FFA increased (P < 0.05) glucose but did not modify insulin levels. ARG increased (P < 0.05) both insulin and glucose levels. Ghrelin did not modify both glucose and insulin responses to OGTT as well as the FFA-induced increase in glucose levels; however, ghrelin administration was followed by transient insulin decrease also during FFA. Ghrelin blunted (P < 0.05) the insulin response to ARG and enhanced (P < 0.05) the ARG-induced increase in glucose levels. In all, ghrelin induces transient decrease of spontaneous insulin secretion and selectively blunts the insulin response to ARG but not to oral glucose load. On the other hand, ghrelin raises basal glucose levels and enhances the hyperglycemic effect of ARG but not that of OGTT. These findings support the hypothesis that ghrelin exerts modulatory action of insulin secretion and glucose metabolism in humans.

Non-acylated ghrelin does not possess the pituitaric and pancreatic endocrine activity of acylated ghrelin in humans.

Ghrelin, a 28-amino acid peptide predominantly produced by the stomach, displays strong GH-releasing activity mediated by the GH secretagogue (GHS)-receptor (GHS-R) type 1a at the hypothalamus-pituitary level. Ghrelin and synthetic GHS also possess other GH-independent peripheral endocrine and non-endocrine activities via the activation of peripheral GHS-R subtypes. In rats in vivo non-acylated ghrelin has been reported devoid of any endocrine activity; however, in vitro, it has been shown as effective as ghrelin in exerting anti-proliferative activity on tumor cell lines. The aim of the present study was to clarify whether non-acylated human ghrelin shares some of the endocrine activities of its acylated form in humans. To this goal, the effects of acylated or non-acylated ghrelin (1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min) on GH, PRL, ACTH, F, insulin and glucose levels were studied in two different testing sessions in 7 normal young volunteers (age [mean +/- SE]: 24.3 +/- 1.7 yr; BMI: 21.5 +/- 0.9 kg/m2). The effects of placebo administration were also studied. The administration of acylated ghrelin induced prompt and marked increase in circulating GH levels (AUC: 5452.4 +/- 904.9 microg*min/l; p < 0.01 vs placebo) and significant increase in PRL (1273.5 +/- 199.7 microg*min/l; p < 0.01 vs placebo), ACTH (4482.7 +/- 954.4 pg*min/ml; p < 0.01 vs placebo) and F levels (15985.0 +/- 1141.9 microg*min/l; p < 0.01 vs placebo). Its administration was also followed by decrease in insulin levels (1448.67 +/- 137.9 mU*min/l; p < 0.05 vs placebo) that was coupled with an increase in plasma glucose levels (10974.2 +/- 852.5 mg*min/dl; p < 0.05 vs placebo). The administration of non-acylated ghrelin and that of placebo did not induce any change in the hormonal parameters or in glucose levels. In conclusion, this study shows that in humans nonacylated ghrelin does not possess the pituitaric and pancreatic endocrine activities of human ghrelin octanoylated in Serine 3.

Natural and synthetic growth hormone secretagogues: do they have therapeutic potential?

Ghrelin, a 28 amino acid-acylated peptide predominantly produced by the stomach, displays strong growth hormone (GH)-releasing activity. It is mediated by the hypothalamic-pituitary GH secretagogue (GHS) receptors, which are specific to a family of synthetic, orally active molecules known as GHSs. However, despite their potent and reproducible GH-releasing activity, the potential clinical use of GHSs as orally active growth-promoting agents or anabolic anti-aging drugs has not been confirmed. Ghrelin and GHSs also exert other actions mediated through central and peripheral receptors, including stimulation of adrenocorticotrophic hormone and prolactin secretion, influence on insulin secretion and glucose metabolism, orexigenic effects and modulatory activity on the neuroendocrine and metabolic response to starvation, influence on exocrine gastro-entero-pancreatic functions, cardiovascular effects and modulation of cell proliferation and apoptosis. The discovery of ghrelin and the characterization of these GH-independent biological activities has widened the knowledge of some critical aspects of neuroendocrinology and suggests possible roles for GHSs and ghrelin in the treatment of pathophysiological conditions, including those unrelated to disorders of GH secretion.

Standard light breakfast inhibits circulating ghrelin level to the same extent of oral glucose load in humans, despite different impact on glucose and insulin levels.

Ghrelin levels are increased by fasting and energy restriction, decreased by food intake, glucose load and insulin but not by lipids and amino acids. Accordingly, ghrelin levels are elevated in anorexia and cachexia and reduced in obesity. Herein we compared the effects of a standardized light breakfast (SLB) on morning circulating ghrelin levels with those of oral glucose load (OGTT) in normal subjects. Specifically, 8 young adult volunteers [age (mean+/-SEM): 28.0+/-2.0 yr; body mass index (BMI): 22.4+/-0.6 kg/m2] underwent the following testing sessions: a) OGTT (100 g p.o. at 0 min, about 400 kcal); b) SLB (about 400 kcal, 45% carbohydrates, 13% proteins and 42% lipids at 0 min) on three different days; c) placebo (100 ml water p.o.). In all sessions, at baseline, blood samples were withdrawn twice at 5-min interval to characterize the inter- and intra-individual reproducibility of the variables assayed. After placebo and OGTT, blood samples were withdrawn every 15 min up to +120 min. After SLB, blood samples were taken at 60 min only. Ghrelin, insulin and glucose levels were assayed at each time point in all sessions. Similarly to insulin and glucose levels, at baseline, ghrelin showed remarkable intra-subject reproducibility both in the same sessions and among the different sessions. Placebo did not significantly modify ghrelin, insulin and glucose. OGTT increased (p<0.01) glucose (baseline vs peak: 80.0+/-3.6 vs 140.5+/-6.3 mg/dl) and insulin (20.2+/-6.2 vs 115.3+/-10.3 mU/l) levels. SLB increased (p<0.05) both insulin (16.3+/-1.8 vs 48.3+/-6.3 mU/l) and glucose (74.5+/-3.7 vs 82.9+/-3.1 mg/dl) levels. Notably both the insulin and glucose increases after OGTT were significantly higher (p<0.01) than that induced by SLB. After OGTT, ghrelin levels underwent a significant reduction (baseline vs nadir: 355.7+/-150.8 vs 243.3+/-98.8 pg/ml; p<0.05) reaching the nadir at time +60 min. Similarly, ghrelin levels 60 min after SLB (264.8+/-44.8 pg/ml) were significantly (p<0.01) lower than at baseline (341.4+/-54.9 pg/ml). No significant differences in the reduction of ghrelin levels after OGTT and SLB were observed. In conclusion, these findings show that light breakfast inhibits ghrelin secretion to the same extent of OGTT in adults despite lower variations in glucose and insulin levels.

EP1572: a novel peptido-mimetic GH secretagogue with potent and selective GH-releasing activity in man.

EP1572 UMV1843 [Aib-DTrp-DgTrp-CHO]) is a new peptido-mimetic GH secretagogue (GHS) showing binding potency to the GHS-receptor in animal and human tissues similar to that of ghrelin and peptidyl GHS. EP1572 induces marked GH increase after s.c. administration in neonatal rats. Preliminary data in 2 normal young men show that: 1) acute i.v. EP1572 administration (1.0 microg/kg) induces strong and selective increase of GH levels; 2) single oral EP1572 administration strongly and reproducibly increases GH levels even after a dose as low as 0.06 mg/kg. Thus, EP1572 is a new peptido-mimetic GHS with potent and selective GH-releasing activity.

Ghrelin, a natural GH secretagogue produced by the stomach, induces hyperglycemia and reduces insulin secretion in humans.

Ghrelin, a 28 amino acid gastric hormone is a natural ligand of the GH Secretagogue (GHS) receptor (GHS-R) and strongly stimulates GH secretion though, like synthetic GHS, it shows other endocrine and non-endocrine activities. Aim of the present study was to clarify whether ghrelin administration influences insulin and glucose levels in humans. To this goal, we compared the effects of ghrelin, hexarelin, a synthetic GHS, or placebo on insulin and glucose as well as on GH levels in 11 normal young volunteers (age [mean +/- SEM]: 28.5 +/- 3.1 yr; BMI: 22.2 +/- 0.9 Kg/m(2)). Ghrelin induced very marked increase in GH secretion (DeltaAUC(0-180): 5777.1 +/- 812.6 microg/l/h; p < 0.01) which was not modified by placebo. Placebo administration did not modify insulin and glucose levels. On the other hand, ghrelin administration induced a prompt increase in glucose levels (DeltaAUC(0-180): 1343.1 +/- 443.5 mg/dl/h; p < 0.01 vs. saline). Absolute glucose levels at +15' were already higher than those at baseline (93.9 +/- 7.1 mg/dl; p < 0.01) and persisted elevated up to 165' (90.3 +/- 5.8 mg/dl; p < 0.01 vs. 0'). Ghrelin administration was also followed by a decrease in serum insulin levels (DeltaAUC(0-180): -207.1 +/- 70.5 mU/l/h; p < 0.05 vs. saline). Absolute insulin levels were significantly reduced from 30' (11.4 +/- 0.9 mU/l, p < 0.1 vs. 0'), showed the nadir at +45' (10.0 +/- 0.6 mU/l, p < 0.01 vs. 0') and then persisted lower (p < 0.01) than baseline up to +105'. Hexarelin administration did not modify glucose and insulin levels despite its marked GH-releasing effect (DeltaAUC(0-180): 4156.8 +/- 1180.3 microg/l/h; p < 0.01 vs. saline) that was slightly lower (p < 0.05) than that of ghrelin. In conclusion, these findings show that, besides stimulating GH secretion, ghrelin is a gastric hormone possessing metabolic actions such as hyperglycemic effect and lowering effect on insulin secretion in humans, at least after acute administration.

Growth hormone-independent cardiotropic activities of growth hormone-releasing peptides in normal subjects, in patients with growth hormone deficiency, and in patients with idiopathic or ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Growth hormone releasing peptides (GHRPs) are synthetic molecules endowed with potent neuroendocrine activities mediated by specific receptors in the pituitary and in the central nervous system. GHRPs receptors have been reported even in perpheral tissues, particularly in the myocardium, where they probably mediate growth hormone (GH)-independent activities. We studied in humans the cardiac effects of hexarelin administration in 7 normal adults, in 7 severe GH-deficient patients, and in 12 patients with severe dilated cardiomyopathy. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), mean blood pressure (MBP), heart rate (HR), and GH levels were evaluated at baseline and every 15 min up to 60 min after acute 2.0 microg/kg iv hexarelin administration. Basal LVEF in dilated cardiomyopathy was impaired and lower (p < 0.001) than in GH deficiency, in turn lower (p< 0.001) than in normal subjects. Hexarelin signficantly (p < 0.05) increased LVEF in normal and in GH-deficient subjects, but not in dilated cardiomyopathy, without significant variations in MBP and HR. Hexeralin significantly (p < 0.05) increased GH levels in normal subjects and in dilated cardiomyopathy but not in GH deficiency. These findings suggest that, in humans, the acute administration of hexarelin exerts a GH-independent positive inotropic effect likely mediated by specific GHRPs myocardial receptors.

Endocrine activities of ghrelin, a natural growth hormone secretagogue (GHS), in humans: comparison and interactions with hexarelin, a nonnatural peptidyl GHS, and GH-releasing hormone.

An endogenous ligand for the GH secretagogue-receptor (GHS-receptor) has recently been isolated, from both the rat and the human stomach, and named ghrelin. It is a 28-amino-acid peptide showing a unique structure with an n-octanoyl ester at its third serine residue, which is essential for its potent stimulatory activity on somatotroph secretion. In fact, it has been demonstrated that ghrelin specifically stimulates GH secretion from both rat pituitary cells in culture and rats in vivo. The aim of the present study was to test the GH-releasing activity of ghrelin in humans and to compare it with that of GHRH and hexarelin (HEX), a nonnatural peptidyl GHS, which possesses strong GH-releasing activity but also significantly stimulates PRL, ACTH, and cortisol secretion. To clarify the mechanisms of action underlying the GH-releasing activity of ghrelin in humans, its interaction with GHRH and HEX was also studied. Seven normal young volunteers (7 men; 24-32 yr old; body mass index, 20-24 kg/m(2)) were studied. All subjects underwent the administration of ghrelin, HEX, and GHRH-29 (1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min) as well as placebo (2 mL isotonic saline i.v. at 0 min). Six subjects also underwent the combined administration of ghrelin and GHRH or HEX. Blood samples were taken every 15 min from -15 up to +180 min. GH levels were assayed at each time point in all sessions; PRL, ACTH, cortisol, and aldosterone levels were also assayed after administration of ghrelin and/or HEX. Ghrelin administration induced a prompt and marked increase in circulating GH levels (Cmax, mean +/- SEM, 92.1 +/- 16.7 microg/L; area under the curve, 1894.9 +/- 347.8 microg/L.h). The GH response to ghrelin was clearly higher (P < 0.01) than the one recorded after GHRH (26.7 +/- 8.7 microg/L; 619.6 +/- 174.4 microg/L.h) and even significantly higher (P < 0.05) than after HEX (68.4 +/- 14.7 microg/L; 1546.9 +/- 380.0 microg/L x h). Ghrelin administration also induced an increase in PRL, ACTH, and cortisol levels; these responses were higher (P < 0.05) than those elicited by HEX. A significant increase in aldosterone levels was recorded after ghrelin but not after HEX. The endocrine responses to ghrelin were not modified by the coadministration of HEX. On the other hand, the coadministration of ghrelin and GHRH had a real synergistical effect (P < 0.05) on GH secretion (133.6 +/- 22.5 microg/L; 3374.3 +/- 617.3 microg/L x h). In conclusion, ghrelin, a natural ligand of GHS-receptor, exerts a strong stimulatory effect on GH secretion in humans, releasing more GH than GHRH and even more than a nonnatural GHS such as HEX. Ghrelin, as well as HEX, also stimulates lactotroph and corticotroph secretion. Ghrelin shows no interaction with HEX, whereas it has a synergistical effect with GHRH on GH secretion. Thus, ghrelin is a new hormone playing a major role in the control of somatotroph secretion in humans, and its effects are imitated by nonnatural GHS.

Effect of digoxin on the somatotroph responsiveness to growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) alone or combined with arginine in normal young volunteers.

BACKGROUND: The activity of the GH/IGF-I axis, known to play a major role in myocardial structure and function, has been reported to be altered in patients with chronic heart failure. AIM AND DESIGN OF THE STUDY: In order to evaluate the possibility that clinically used cardioactive drugs may exert neuroendocrine influences on somatotroph secretion, we studied the effects of pretreatment with enalapril (20 mg/day orally for 3 days), furosemide (20 mg i.v. as a bolus at -5 minutes) or digoxin (0.25 mg orally 4x/day for 3 days) on the GH response to growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) (1.0 microg/ kg i.v. as a bolus at 0 minutes) in 12 healthy male adults (age [mean +/- SEM] 30.2 +/- 1.4 years; BMI 22.7 +/- 0.7 kg/ m2). In a subgroup of 8 subjects the same study was performed testing the GH response to GHRH + arginine (ARG; 0.5 g/kg i.v. from 0 to + 30 minutes). RESULTS The GH response to GHRH (1,304.1 +/- 248-5 microg/l/h) was not modified by enalapril (1,368.7 +/- 171.2 microg/l/h) or by furosemide (1,269.3 +/- 185.2 microg/l/h) but was significantly blunted by digoxin (613.6 +/- 73.2 microg/l/h, P < 0.05). On the other hand digoxin, enalapril and furosemide did not modify the GH response to GHRH +ARG. CONCLUSIONS: Digoxin, but not enalapril or furosemide, inhibits the GH response to GHRH in normal subjects. The blunting effect of digoxin on the GHRH-induced GH response is counteracted by arginine. These findings show that digoxin possesses an inhibitory effect on somatotroph secretion that may be mediated at the hypothalamic level.

Normal IGF-I and enhanced IGFBP-3 response to very low rhGH dose in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

Well-nourished patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) show slight reduction of mean basal IGF-I levels which, however, display a response to a rhGH dose as low as 5.0 microg/kg/day similar to that of age-matched control subjects (CS). To further investigate peripheral GH sensitivity, we studied the IGF-I and IGFBP-3 responses to 4-day s.c. 2.5 microg/kg/day rhGH administration, the lowest effective dose able to increase IGF-I levels in normal subjects, in 10 DCM patients [age (mean+/-SE): 57.6+/-1.0 yr, body mass index (BMI): 24.0+/-1.2 kg/m2, left ventricular ejection fraction: 26.2+/-3.2%, NYHA (New York Heart Association): I/0, II/4, III/4, IV/2] and in 9 age-matched healthy CS (age: 55.3+/-1.2 yr, BMI: 23.7+/-1.8 kg/m2). Basal IGF-I levels in DCM were lower though not significantly than those in CS (147.7+/-9.8 vs 174.7+/-17.0 microg/l). Basal IGFBP-3 levels in DCM were similar to those in CS (3.1+/-0.3 vs 2.7+/-0.2 mg/l). In CS 4-day rhGH increased IGF-I levels (222.4+/-14.9 microg/l; p<0.01 vs baseline) but did not modify IGFBP-3 levels (3.0+/-0.2 mg/l). In DCM IGF-I levels were increased by 4-day rhGH administration (175.7+/-11.0 microg/l; p<0.05 vs baseline) with a similar percent extent than in CS. On the other hand, in DCM, but not in CS, 4-day rhGH significantly increased IGFBP-3 levels (3.5+/-0.3 mg/l; p<0.05 vs baseline). Therefore, in conclusion, testing with the lowest effective rhGH dose further suggest that peripheral GH sensitivity in well-nourished DCM is preserved. On the other hand, DCM patients show enhanced IGFBP-3 sensitivity to stimulation by rhGH.

Endocrine activities of alexamorelin (Ala-His-d-2-methyl-Trp-Ala-Trp-d-Phe-Lys-NH2), a synthetic GH secretagogue, in humans.

OBJECTIVE: Peptidyl and non-peptidyl synthetic GH secretagogues (GHS) possess significant GH-, prolactin (PRL)- and ACTH/cortisol-releasing activity after i.v. and even p.o. administration, acting via specific hypothalamo-pituitary receptors in both animals and humans. The hexapeptide hexarelin (HEX) is a paradigmatic GHS whose activities have been widely studied in humans. The heptapeptide Ala-His-d-2-methyl-Trp-Ala-Trp-d-Phe-Lys-NH(2) (alexamorelin, ALEX) is a new synthetic molecule which inhibits GHS binding in vitro, but its endocrine activity has never been studied in humans. DESIGN: In six young adults we studied the effects of 1.0 and 2.0 microgram/kg i.v. ALEX or HEX on GH, PRL, ACTH, cortisol and aldosterone levels and those of 20mg p.o. ( approximately 300 microgram/kg) on GH levels. RESULTS: Basal GH, PRL, ACTH, cortisol and aldosterone levels in all testing sessions were similar. ALEX and HEX (1.0 and 2.0 microgram/kg i.v.) induced the same dose-dependent increase of GH and PRL levels. Both ALEX and HEX induced a dose-dependent increase of ACTH and cortisol levels. The ACTH and cortisol responses to the highest ALEX dose were significantly higher than those after HEX. Aldosterone levels significantly increased after both i.v. ALEX doses, but not after HEX. The GH response to 20mg p.o. ALEX was higher, though not significantly, than that to the same HEX dose. CONCLUSION: ALEX, a new GHS, shows the same GH-releasing activity as HEX. On the other hand, ALEX seems endowed with an ACTH-releasing activity more marked than that of HEX; this evidence could explain the significant increase of aldosterone levels after its i.v. administration.

Patients with dilated cardiomyopathy show reduction of the somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH both alone and combined with arginine.

OBJECTIVE: Altered function of the GH/IGF-I axis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) has been reported. In fact, DCM patients show reduction of IGF-I levels, which could reflect slight peripheral GH resistance or, alternatively, reduced somatotroph secretion. Spontaneous GH secretion has been reported to be altered by some but not by other authors, whereas the GH response to GHRH, but not that to GH-releasing peptides, seems reduced in DCM patients. On the other hand, it is well known that the GH response to GHRH in humans is markedly potentiated by arginine (ARG), which probably acts via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release; in fact the GHRH+ARG test is known as one of the most reliable to evaluate the maximal secretory capacity of somatotroph cells. METHODS: In order to further clarify the somatotroph function in DCM, in well-nourished patients with DCM (34 male, 4 female; age (mean+/-s.e. m.) 57.8+/-1.1 years; body mass index (BMI) 24.6+/-0.6kg/m(2); left ventricular ejection fraction 23.2+/-1.6%; New York Heart Association classification I/1, II/17, III/18, IV/2) we studied the GH response to GHRH (1.0 microgram/kg i.v.) alone or combined with ARG (0.5g/kg i.v.). The results in DCM patients were compared with those in age-matched control subjects (CS) (39 male, 7 female; age 58.9+/-1.0 years; BMI 23.2+/-0.3kg/m(2)). RESULTS: Mean IGF-I levels in DCM patients were lower than in CS (144.3+/-6.9 vs 175.1+/-8. 4 microgram/l, P<0.05) whereas basal GH levels were similar in both groups (1.7+/-0.3 vs 1.7+/-0.3 microgram/l). The GH response to GHRH in DCM patients was lower (P<0.05) than that in CS (GH peak 6.5+/-1.2 vs 10.7+/-2.1 microgram/l). In both groups the GH response to GHRH+ARG was higher (P<0.001) than that to GHRH alone. However, the GH response to GHRH+ARG in DCM patients remained clearly lower (P<0.01) than that in CS (18.3+/-3.2 vs 34.1+/-4.6 microgram/l). The GH response to GHRH alone and combined with ARG was not associated with the severity of the disease. CONCLUSION: DCM patients show blunted GH responses to GHRH both alone and combined with ARG. Evidence that ARG does not restore the GH response to GHRH in DCM patients makes it unlikely that the somatotroph hyporesponsiveness to the neurohormone reflects hyperactivity of hypothalamic somatostatinergic neurons.